© 2024 St. Louis Public Radio
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Court Rules Missouri Corrections Officials Did Not Violate Sunshine Law In Execution Cases

A state appeals court said that Missouri corrrections officials do not have to disclose the names of the pharmacists who supply the drugs used in executions.
A state appeals court said that Missouri corrrections officials do not have to disclose the names of the pharmacists who supply the drugs used in executions.

Missouri corrections officials are not required to disclose the identities of the pharmacists who supply the state’s lethal execution drugs, an appeals court ruled Tuesday.

Reversing a lower court judge who had ordered the Department of Corrections to reveal their names, the Missouri Court of Appeals found that the DOC did not violate the state’s Sunshine Law by refusing to provide them.

The court cited a Missouri law that gives the director of the DOC discretion to select the members of the execution team, including those who administer the lethal chemicals or gas used in executions and those who provide them with “direct support.” The same law provides that the identities of the team’s members are to be kept confidential.

“There is nothing within the language of the statute that suggests that the legislature intended for pharmacists to be excluded from the protections provided by the statute, or intended for courts to second-guess the wisdom of the DOC, unless it is apparent that the DOC abused the discretion granted by the legislature,” the three-judge appeals court panel found.

The decision came in three parallel cases that sought the names of the pharmacists. One of the cases was brought by five news organizations: the Associated Press, The Kansas City Star, The St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the Springfield News-Leader and The Guardian.

Kansas City attorney Bernie Rhodes, who represents the news organizations, said he and other attorneys were considering whether to ask the court for a rehearing or to have the case transferred to the Missouri Supreme Court.

“They’re saying the director could appoint you as a member of the execution team,” Rhodes said. “That’s not what the statute says. It says ‘shall consist of those who administer lethal gas or lethal chemicals’ and ‘those persons who provide direct support for the administration of lethal gas or lethal chemicals,’ period.”

The other lawsuits were filed by former Missouri legislator Joan Bray, a death penalty opponent, and by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, the American Civil Liberties Union and Christopher S. McDaniel, formerly of St. Louis Public Radio.

Missouri, like many states, has had difficulty finding lethal injection drugs after drug makers began refusing to provide them. The state has resorted to using largely unregulated compounding pharmacies, often keeping the sources of the drugs secret.

In their lawsuit, the five news organizations said that public disclosure of the source, quality and composition of the drugs “reduces the risk that improper, ineffective, or defectively prepared drugs are used; it allows public oversight of the types of drugs selected to cause death and qualifications of those manufacturing the chosen drugs; and it promotes the proper functioning of everyone involved in the execution process.”

In March, Cole County Circuit Judge Jon E. Beetem ruled that while an exemption in the Sunshine Law protects the identities of the doctor and nurse who are present during executions as well as non-medical personnel who assist them, it does not protect the identities of the pharmacists who supply the execution drugs.

He also ordered the DOC to pay the plaintiffs’ costs and attorneys’ fees. In the news organizations' case, that amounted to $73,335.

In reversing Beetem, the appeals court also ruled that he had wrongly awarded the plaintiffs’ their costs and legal fees.

“Where there was no violation of the Sunshine Law, awarding attorney’s fees was improper,” the court stated.

Last July, the appeals court rejected another challenge to Missouri's execution protocol. The court upheld a lower court's dismissal of a lawsuit brought by four taxpayers, including Bray, that sought to halt the then-scheduled execution of convicted murderer David Zink. The execution went ahead as scheduled on July 14, 2015.

Zink had been found guilty of first-degree murder, kidnapping and rape in the 2001 death of 19-year-old Amanda Morton.

The taxpayers argued that Missouri's lethal-injection method violated federal regulations barring the compounding of pentobarbital, the injection drug used in Missouri executions. 

Dan Margolies is KCUR’s health editor. You can reach him on Twitter @DanMargolies.

Copyright 2020 KCUR 89.3. To see more, visit .

Dan was born in Brooklyn, N.Y. and moved to Kansas City with his family when he was eight years old. He majored in philosophy at Washington University in St. Louis and holds law and journalism degrees from Boston University. He has been an avid public radio listener for as long as he can remember – which these days isn’t very long… Dan has been a two-time finalist in The Gerald Loeb Awards for Distinguished Business and Financial Journalism, and has won multiple regional awards for his legal and health care coverage. Dan doesn't have any hobbies as such, but devours one to three books a week, assiduously works The New York Times Crossword puzzle Thursdays through Sundays and, for physical exercise, tries to get in a couple of rounds of racquetball per week.